home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- This is the C indenter, it originally came from the University of Illinois
- via some distribution tape for PDP-11 Unix. It has subsequently been
- hacked upon by James Gosling @ CMU. It isn't very pretty, and really needs
- to be completely redone, but it is probably the nicest C pretty printer
- around.
-
- Further additions to provide "Kernel Normal Form" were contributed
- by the folks at Sun Microsystems.
-
- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
- > From mnetor!yunexus!oz@uunet.UU.NET Wed Mar 9 15:30:55 1988
- > Date: Tue, 8 Mar 88 18:36:25 EST
- > From: yunexus!oz@uunet.UU.NET (Ozan Yigit)
- > To: bostic@okeeffe.berkeley.edu
- > Cc: ccvaxa!willcox@uunet.UU.NET, jag@sun.com, rsalz@uunet.UU.NET
- > In-Reply-To: Keith Bostic's message of Tue, 16 Feb 88 16:09:06 PST
- > Subject: Re: Indent...
-
- Thank you for your response about indent. I was wrong in my original
- observation (or mis-observation :-). UCB did keep the Illinois
- copyright intact.
-
- The issue still is whether we can distribute indent, and if we can, which
- version. David Willcox (the author) states that:
-
- | Several people have asked me on what basis I claim that indent is in
- | the public domain. I knew I would be sorry I made that posting.
- |
- | Some history. Way back in 1976, the project I worked on at the
- | University of Illinois Center for Advanced Computation had a huge
- | battle about how to format C code. After about a week of fighting, I
- | got disgusted and wrote a program, which I called indent, to reformat C
- | code. It had a bunch of different options that would let you format
- | the output the way you liked. In particular, all of the different
- | formats being championed were supported.
- |
- | It was my first big C program. It was ugly. It wasn't designed, it
- | just sort of grew. But it pretty much worked, and it stopped most of
- | the fighting.
- |
- | As a matter of form, I included a University of Illinois Copyright
- | notice. However, my understanding was that, since the work was done
- | on an ARPA contract, it was in the public domain.
- |
- | Time passed. Some years later, indent showed up on one of the early
- | emacs distributions.
- |
- | Later still, someone from UC Berlekey called the UofI and asked if
- | indent was in the public domain. They wanted to include it in their
- | UNIX distributions, along with the emacs stuff. I was no longer at the
- | UofI, but Rob Kolstad, who was, asked me about it. I told him I didn't
- | care if they used it, and since then it has been on the BSD distributions.
- |
- | Somewhere along the way, several other unnamed people have had their
- | hands in it. It was converted to understand version 7 C. (The
- | original was version 6.) It was converted from its original filter
- | interface to its current "blow away the user's file" interface.
- | The $HOME/.indent.pro file parsing was added. Some more formatting
- | options were added.
- |
- | The source I have right now has two copyright notices. One is the
- | original from the UofI. One is from Berkeley.
- |
- | I am not a lawyer, and I certainly do not understand copyright law. As
- | far as I am concerned, the bulk of this program, everything covered by
- | the UofI copyright, is in the public domain, and worth every penny.
- | Berkeley's copyright probably should only cover their changes, and I
- | don't know their feelings about sending it out.
-
- In any case, there appears to be noone at UofI to clarify/and change
- that copyright, but I am confident (based on the statements of its
- author) that the code, as it stands with its copyright, is
- distributable, and will not cause any legal problems.
-
- Hence, the issue reduces to *which* one to distribute through
- comp.sources.unix. I would suggest that with the permission of you
- folks (given that you have parts copyrighted), we distribute the 4.3
- version of indent, which appears to be the most up-to-date version. I
- happen to have just about every known version of indent, including the
- very original submission from the author to a unix tape, later the
- G-Emacs version, any 4.n version, sun version and the Unipress
- version. I still think we should not have to "go-back-in-time" and
- re-do all the work you people have done.
-
- I hope to hear from you as to what you think about this. You may of
- course send 4.3 version to the moderator directly, or you can let me
- know of your permission, and I will send the sources, or you can let
- me know that 4.3 version is off-limits, in which case we would probably
- have to revert to an older version. One way or another, I hope to get
- a version of indent to comp.sources.unix.
-
- regards.. oz
-
- cc: ccvaxa!willcox
- sun.com!jar
- uunet!rsalz
-
-